loader image

Firstlink Global

News & Commentaries

Old Tool, Maybe New Impact: How the latest U.S. Economic Sanctions Affecting Shipping?

How the latest U.S. Economic Sanctions Affecting Shipping

U.S. sanctions against Iran are not new. What may be different this time is their breadth and potential reach into mainstream shipping. Under Operation Economic Outcast, launched on 24 August, Washington identified shipping among five sectors exposed to expanded secondary-sanctions risk, alongside digital assets, technology, gold and aviation.

 

What Shipping Must Be Wary Of

The risk extends beyond Iranian vessels or cargoes. Owners, charterers, brokers, insurers and bunker suppliers must increasingly scrutinise beneficial ownership, counterparties, banks, cargo origin, STS activity and payment chains. A party does not necessarily have to be American to face consequences: secondary sanctions can target non-U.S. entities continuing specified business with Iran. This raises the importance of KYC, beneficial-ownership checks, vessel trading history, AIS activity, STS movements, cargo origin, insurance and counterparties before fixing.

What Does This Mean for Freight?

In the near term, tighter sanctions could be supportive of freight rates in the compliant tanker market.

If mainstream owners become more cautious about Iran-linked exposure, the pool of acceptable tonnage may tighten. Charterers could therefore compete for fewer compliant vessels, while owners may demand a higher risk or sanctions premium for trades carrying greater compliance uncertainty.

 

Sanctions can also redirect cargoes towards alternative buyers and longer routes, increasing tonne-mile demand and keeping vessels occupied for longer.

However, there is a limit to the upside. If enforcement becomes sufficiently effective to materially reduce Iranian export volumes, fewer cargoes would ultimately mean lower underlying vessel demand.

 

Current Response from the Shipping Industry

The immediate reaction from the shipping industry has been one of heightened caution rather than panic.

Pakistan said it is not “obliged to” comply with unilateral sanctions on Iran unless they are imposed by the United Nations, signaling a willingness to continue trade after the US warned of economic penalties against countries doing business with Tehran.

China has warned it will hit back if its companies are included in the latest US plan to expand Iranian sanctions.

China has made clear on many occasions its firm opposition to illicit unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or the authorisation of the United Nations Security Council.

Shipping activity has also not stopped. Lloyd’s List Intelligence recorded 108 Strait of Hormuz transits during 17–23 August, up 27% week-on-week, although traffic remained substantially below pre-crisis levels.

 

What are the latest development from the US?

When ‘Operation Economic Outcast’ was launched on 24 August, the U.S. simultaneously designated nearly 60 entities, individuals and vessels linked to Iran and its sanctions-evasion networks. More importantly, Washington stated that this was the beginning, rather than the conclusion, of its campaign.

Concrete follow-up has already begun. On 28 August, only four days after the operation was announced, the U.S. Treasury targeted Banque Misr UAE, alleging that it had processed billions of dollars in transactions associated with Iran. The action seeks to cut the bank off from the U.S. financial system.

More significantly, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on 30 August that the U.S. expects to impose new secondary sanctions weekly, initially targeting banks facilitating Iranian transactions.

Conclusion

Such volatility and upheavals is bullish shipping. Rather than looking it as threats, there are actually opportunities. Either side will have merits in arguments but overall shipping will thrive.

PLATTS TREND
WORLD SCALE 25-Aug-26 26-Aug-26 27-Aug-26 7-DAYS
AVERAGE
1-DAY
CHANGE
7-DAYS
CHANGE
7-DAYS-
CHANGE
SPORE/JPN   (30 KT) 262.5 266 276 237.88 10 71 34.63%
SPORE/OZ    (35 KT) 305 307.5 315 282.81 7.5 60 23.53%
KOREA /OZ   (35 KT) 327.5 340 340 316.88 0 50 17.24%
INDIA/JAPAN  (35 KT) 230 235 245 218.75 10 45 22.50%
$1 = $1K 25-Aug-26 26-Aug-26 27-Aug-26
SPORE/HK 625 650 700 600.63 50 150 27.27%
KOREA/SPORE   1025 1250 1275 1,015.00 25 390 44.07%
KOREA/JAPAN    750 925 950 734.38 25 325 52.00%
KOREA/H.K.    900 1050 1100 871.88 50 340 44.74%
KOREA/USWC    2,475 2,700 2,800 2,443.75 100 550 24.44%
WORLD SCALE 25-Aug-26 26-Aug-26 27-Aug-26
AG/JAPAN       (55 KT) 475 475 490 414.38 15 152.5 45.19%
AG/JAPAN       (75 KT) 470 470 485 439.69 15 100 25.97%
OMAN G./JAPAN (55 KT) 300 300 315 262.50 15 95 43.18%
OMAN G./JAPAN (75 KT) 290 290 305 272.19 15 60 24.49%

The regional market remains split, with Southeast Asia broadly steady to soft while the Far East stays firm. Intra-SEA and Northbound activity remain limited, with thin spot demand and sufficient tonnage keeping freight close to recent levels despite weather-related disruptions. In contrast, Intra-FEAST availability remains tight into late September, as forward commitments and recurring port delays reduce workable vessel supply and support firmer rate ideas. Southbound continues to benefit from this tightness, with fewer owners willing to reposition south amid weak northbound returns and higher schedule risk. Overall, freight remains largely unchanged in Southeast Asia but continues to show upward pressure across the Far East, with firm conditions potentially extending into the winter period.

VESSEL SIZE GRADE L/C LOAD DISCHARGE FREIGHT CHTRS
VNR 10 MTBE 25-30 SEP MID CHINA SPORE $455K CNR
STI MODEST 35 CPP 08 SEP TAIWAN OZ WS337.5 BP
CLEAROCEAN MARAUDER 35 NAP 12 SEP KOREA JAPAN 950K ENEOS
EAGLE HANOVER 80 COND 17 SEP BARROW ISL BRUNEI WS200 HENGYI
MARAN MYRSINI (SMAX N/B) 130 CPP 10 SEP SIKKA UKC-OPTS 6.9M RELIANCE
BUNKER PRICE
(US$/MT)
25-Aug 26-Aug 27-Aug 3-DAYS
AVERAGE
1-DAY
CHANGE
3-DAYS CHANGE
VLSFO 0.5
SINGAPORE 817.0 781.0 770.5 789.5 -10.5 -46.5
FUJAIRAH 809.5 788.0 785.5 794.3 -2.5 -24.0
ROTTERDAM 675.0 658.5 656.5 663.3 -2.0 -18.5
HOUSTON 695.0 679.0 676.5 683.5 -2.5 -18.5
GLOBAL MARKET 811.5 794.5 791.5 799.2 -3.0 -20.0
MGO
SINGAPORE 1209.5 1139.5 1129.5 1159.5 -10.0 -80.0
FUJAIRAH 1419.0 1384.0 1376.5 1393.2 -7.5 -42.5
ROTTERDAM 1253.0 1220.5 1213.5 1229.0 -7.0 -39.5
HOUSTON 1254.0 1232.0 1218.0 1234.7 -14.0 -36.0
GLOBAL MARKET 1371.0 1341.0 1342.0 1351.3 +1.0 -29.0
IFO 380 (HSFO)
SINGAPORE 654.5 628.5 627.0 636.7 -1.5 -27.5
FUJAIRAH 653.5 623.5 616.0 631.0 -7.5 -37.5
ROTTERDAM 546.0 532.0 528.5 535.5 -3.5 -17.5
HOUSTON 474.5 463.5 469.5 469.2 +6.0 -5.0
GLOBAL MARKET 636.5 625.0 625.0 628.8 -11.5

VLSFO

VLSFO prices declined across all major bunkering hubs over the three-day period, led by a sharper correction in Singapore. Lower crude oil prices and growing hopes for an agreement to improve shipping through the Strait of Hormuz reduced some supply concerns and weighed on bunker prices. However, actual vessel traffic through the strait remains well below normal, limiting the downside.

MGO

MGO prices also moved lower across all major bunkering hubs, with Singapore recording the largest decline. The recent fall in crude prices has put pressure on marine gasoil prices, although the market remains supported by tight refined-fuel supply, with refinery disruptions and reduced flows from key producing regions continuing to affect diesel availability

HSFO

HSFO prices weakened across most major bunkering hubs during the three-day period. Lower crude prices and expectations of improved oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz have reduced some of the recent risk premium, while the continued disruption in regional shipping has prevented a stronger correction.

Tradewinds reported that Frontline  has revealed a bigger queue of charterers looking to fix their freight costs with long-term VLCC charters. Spot rates have hit record highs due to Middle East disruption, but the John Fredriksen-backed company revealed that two 2016-built ships were fixed out on two and three-year deals, with rates starting at $110,000 per day in the first year and falling after that.

Meanwhile, BW Group product tanker giant Hafnia has called time on its joint venture with Monaco-based International Andromeda Shipping. H&A Shipping was formed in 2021, with Hafnia taking a 50% stake in two MR tankers. These stakes have now been sold for a profit of $13.3m, the BW Group company said.H&A is now expected to be liquidated, it added.

  • U.S. Department of the Treasury (2026) – Treasury Launches Unprecedented Campaign Against Iranian Regime on Economic D-Day – 24 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • U.S. Department of the Treasury (2026) – Remarks from Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent on Operation Economic Outcast against Iran – 24 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • U.S. Department of the Treasury (2026) – Iran’s Access to UAE Banks Targeted Under Operation Economic Outcast – 28 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Reuters (2026) – Looming US sanctions on Iran put China oil buying in spotlight – 24 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Reuters Breakingviews (2026) – US ‘D-Day’ on Iran barely makes it off the beach – 25 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Reuters (2026) – US hits Egyptian bank branches with Iran sanctions as war marks six months – 28 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Reuters (2026) – War weighs on Iran’s economy as US intensifies sanctions – 29 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Reuters (2026) – Bessent expects new US secondary sanctions weekly, aiming to increase pressure on Iran – 30 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Tradewinds (2026) – Frontline boss Barstad: We could fix four more VLCCs on long-term deals today – 28 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Tradewinds (2026) – Hafnia exits joint venture with Andromeda in profit as eight tankers sold– 28 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Bloomberg (2026) – Yuan Traders Are Brushing Off US Sanction Threats Over Iran – 28 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • Bloomberg (2026) US Tells Iran’s Trade Partners to Cut Ties or Face Sanctions – 28 August 2026, accessed August 2026.
  • S&P Global Commodity Insights (Platts). Clean tanker freight assessments and tanker market intelligence, accessed August 2026.
  • Saxo Investor, accessed August 2026.
  • Firstlink Research Team. (2026). Internal Market Analysis . Firstlink Global Pte. Ltd., Singapore.

8 Comments

  1. Apart from bullish shipping, this might also accelerates de-dollarization and depolarization from the US trade dominance.

  2. The new sanctions could make shipping to and from Iran more difficult. Careful checks on cargo, counterparties and vessel history will become even more important.

  3. Totally agree. Volatility and all these disruptions may look like threats, but they also create plenty of opportunities for shipping. Both sides will have valid points, but at the end of the day, shipping has always been good at adapting. I think the industry will continue to thrive.

  4. Nice article….So shipping isn’t just about sailing anymore—it’s basically half logistics and half detective work just to make sure you don’t break any rules.

  5. Sanctions could actually boost shipping in the short term by reducing available vessels and pushing cargoes onto longer routes.

  6. Remains to be seen what the tighter sanctions entail or is it just another showmanship for symbolic and posturing purpose. Will it fizzle out as quick as it was implemented?

  7. Good to see bunker down, freight up. Signs of healthy markets. Stricter sanctions could tighten crude tonnage too, we may be in for a higher level freight market q4 and 2027.

  8. Good reminder that sanctions are not simply “bullish for shipping”. The real impact depends on whether they reroute cargoes and reduce compliant tonnage, or actually remove cargo volumes altogether. For owners, charterers and brokers, KYC and counterparty risk are becoming increasingly important commercial considerations, not just compliance formalities.

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *